The locality police seem to be working overtime on this one, so I`ll try to shed some light. The Hueco baby that Mike R acquired from me came from a pair of Huecos that I purchased from Dan J about 6 years ago. I actually acquired 2.2 from Dan. Three of these babies were very typical looking. One baby was very unique with a more ornate/speckled pattern. That particular female has produced three clutches for me. Earlier clutches have yielded some babies with mild to moderate speckling. I used a more speckled male with this past clutch, and produced a relatively typical looking group of Hueco babies with one exception. The exception took her mother`s unusual pattern to the extreme. My other pair of Huecos have the more traditional look to them and so do their offspring.
I have known Dan for over 15 years and I completely trust the integrity of his animals. We live relatively close to one another and have traded and sold animals among ourselves for years. Dan was alittle hesitant to part with this particular female because she was so unique looking. Her clutch mates showed some speckling, but she was unique. Dan had no reason to mislead me on the animal`s locality. He could have sold her for just as much regardless of locality. After producing about 16-18 babies from this animal over the past three years, Mike R`s animal was the first to exceed her mother`s unusual pattern. Next year, I can breed her back to my more traditional looking pinstripe male and get more traditional babies or shoot for another unique one by using the more speckled male. Decisions, decisions.... I guess its a nice problem to have.
I don`t know how to post their pics on this site and its too late at night to try to learn. Just for fun, I`ll post them on the alterna classifieds with a silly price. The moderator might remove them, but they should be up for awhile. I hope that this will enable everyone to sleep better.
Cheers,
David D







_006-med.jpg)
