Home > General Topics S-Z > Taxonomy Discussion
Page: 1 2 3
- Looking for some info/help.........>
- chas*e, Jan 10, 2004
- Wells & Wellington papers (Snake sections) available online
- WW, Jan 9, 2004
- Thanks Richard, Carl and Wolfgang. Gladly appreciated...
- Wulf, Jan 9, 2004
- RE: Wells & Wellington papers (Snake sections) available online
- CKing, Jan 10, 2004
- They don't work for me...
- steno, Jan 10, 2004
- RE: They don't work for me...
- WW, Jan 11, 2004
- Thank you Wulf...NP
- steno, Jan 11, 2004
- steno, don't thank me! It's Wolfgang /np
- wulf, Jan 11, 2004
- Ooops! ...sorry Wolfgang thank you /np
- steno, Jan 11, 2004
- wanted...
- wulf, Jan 2, 2004
- Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- rayhoser, Dec 31, 2003
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- CKing, Jan 1, 2004
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- ScottThomson, Jan 1, 2004
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- rayhoser, Jan 1, 2004
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- ScottThomson, Jan 1, 2004
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- CKing, Jan 1, 2004
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- ScottThomson, Jan 2, 2004
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- richardwells, Jan 2, 2004
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- rayhoser, Jan 2, 2004
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- rayhoser, Jan 2, 2004
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- ScottThomson, Jan 2, 2004
- Taxonomic Changes "Made Behind the Scenes"
- CKing, Dec 21, 2003
- Agreements and disagreements with WW's criticism of Hoser
- CKing, Dec 14, 2003
- RE: Ignoring taxonomic proposals made in "amateur" publications
- CKing, Dec 14, 2003
- Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- rayhoser, Dec 16, 2003
- RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- CKing, Dec 16, 2003
- RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- paalexan, Dec 17, 2003
- RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- CKing, Dec 17, 2003
- RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- WW, Dec 18, 2003
- RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- CKing, Dec 18, 2003
- RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- wulf, Dec 18, 2003
- RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- CKing, Dec 19, 2003
- RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- ScottThomson, Dec 29, 2003
- RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- CKing, Jan 11, 2004
- Budding vs. Splitting
- CKing, Dec 13, 2003
- Morelia Discription...
- Tormato, Dec 13, 2003
- Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- CKing, Dec 4, 2003
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- RichardFHoyer, Dec 11, 2003
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- CKing, Dec 12, 2003
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- RichardFHoyer, Dec 12, 2003
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- CKing, Dec 13, 2003
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- RichardFHoyer, Dec 16, 2003
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- ScottThomson, Dec 29, 2003
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- CKing, Jan 1, 2004
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- ScottThomson, Jan 1, 2004
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- CKing, Jan 1, 2004
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- ScottThomson, Jan 2, 2004
- Cytochrome b and the use for phylogenetic analysis?
- wulf, Dec 4, 2003
- Contrived taxa and why the Hennigians or cladists have to recognize them
- CKing, Dec 3, 2003
- What is the current status of Kisatchie corns?
- bengkulu, Dec 2, 2003
- RE: What is the current status of Kisatchie corns?
- reptileheaven, Dec 2, 2003
- RE: What is the current status of Kisatchie corns?
- bengkulu, Dec 2, 2003
- RE: What is the current status of Kisatchie corns?
- CKing, Dec 2, 2003
- RE: What is the current status of Kisatchie corns?
- paalexan, Dec 2, 2003
- RE: "Pantherophis" is a contrived genus, one of many contrived genera
- CKing, Dec 2, 2003
- Thank god you're in the minority.
- paalexan, Dec 3, 2003
- RE: Thank god you're in the minority.
- CKing, Dec 3, 2003
- `Good scientists' and `good philosophers'
- paalexan, Dec 3, 2003
- RE: `Good scientists' and `good philosophers'
- CKing, Dec 3, 2003
- RE: `Good scientists' and `good philosophers'
- botany103, Dec 19, 2003
- RE: `Good scientists' and `good philosophers'
- WW, Dec 20, 2003
- RE: From polyphyletic to paraphyletic to "non-monophyletic"
- CKing, Dec 21, 2003
- band count?
- smokeysshadow, Dec 2, 2003
- RE: band count?
- WW, Dec 2, 2003
- RE: band count?
- smokeysshadow, Dec 2, 2003
- RE: band count?
- CKing, Dec 3, 2003
- RE: band count?
- smokeysshadow, Dec 3, 2003
- RE: band count?
- scott Eipper, Dec 3, 2003
- RE: band count?
- WW, Dec 4, 2003
- Fair point n/p
- scott eipper, Dec 4, 2003
- Helpful, and not so helpful people!
- reptileheaven, Dec 1, 2003
- name changes for my group site on candoia
- sigbboy, Nov 29, 2003
- Hey! Science types! Dumb question!
- meretseger, Nov 26, 2003
- RE: Hey! Science types! Dumb question!
- CKing, Nov 26, 2003
- RE: Hey! Science types! Dumb question!
- meretseger, Nov 26, 2003
- RE: Hey! Science types! Dumb question!
- WW, Nov 27, 2003
- RE: Hey! Science types! Dumb question!
- meretseger, Nov 27, 2003
- RE: Hey! Science types! Dumb question!
- CKing, Nov 27, 2003
- Gecko Publications
- reptileaaron, Nov 26, 2003
- Biochemical homoplasy and the evolution of venom
- CKing, Nov 25, 2003
- Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more...
- reptileheaven, Nov 23, 2003
- RE: Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more...
- WW, Nov 23, 2003
- RE: Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more...
- reptileheaven, Nov 23, 2003
- RE: Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more...
- wulf, Nov 23, 2003
- RE: Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more...
- rayhoser, Nov 23, 2003
- RE: Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more...
- wulf, Nov 24, 2003
- RE: Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more...
- WW, Nov 24, 2003
- RE: Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more...
- CKing, Nov 25, 2003
- Be sure to let us poor shlubs..
- meretseger, Nov 25, 2003
- RE: Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more...
- CKing, Nov 26, 2003
- RE: Be sure to let us poor shlubs..
- reptileheaven, Nov 26, 2003
- RE: Be sure to let us poor shlubs..
- meretseger, Nov 26, 2003
- Calabaria, Eryx & Gongylophis
- reptileheaven, Nov 23, 2003
- Candoia species
- reptileheaven, Nov 23, 2003
Page: 1 2 3 |