Thanks Paul-
It helps somewhat. The only thing I'm having a hard time figuring out is why I've never heard of the term "het" to describe the tiger gene before. Much like the Jaguar gene, a carrier displays it in the first generation. Non-carriers from the same clutch appear and are "normal". I also remember reading that either the Jag or Tiger (don't remember which or if it is both) have no heterozygous form. I may have to spend a little $$ to really figure out if these are actually "het", and how the gene works. Thanks for your help, and any further insight is appreciated.
Mike

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ]