return to main index

  mobile - desktop
follow us on facebook follow us on twitter follow us on YouTube link to us on LinkedIn
Click here for LLL Reptile & Supply  
click here for  Animal Specialties
This Space Available
3 months for $50.00
Locate a business by name: click to list your business
search the classifieds. buy an account
events by zip code list an event
Search the forums             Search in:
News & Events: FWC moves forward with rule change in Florida . . . . . . . . . .  Herp Photo of the Day: Happy Rattlesnake Friday! . . . . . . . . . .  Western Maryland Reptile Show - Mar. 06, 2021 . . . . . . . . . .  All Maryland Reptile Show - Mar. 13, 2021 . . . . . . . . . .  Richmond Reptile Expo - Mar. 20, 2021 . . . . . . . . . .  Battlefield Reptile Expo - Mar. 20 2021 . . . . . . . . . .  Reptiles At The York Expo Center - Mar. 27, 2021 . . . . . . . . . .  All Maryland Reptile Show - Apr. 03, 2021 . . . . . . . . . .  East Coast Reptile Super Expo - Apr. 10, 2021 . . . . . . . . . .  Northern Virginia Reptile Show - Apr. 17, 2021 . . . . . . . . . .  Hamburg Reptile Show - Apr. 24, 2021 . . . . . . . . . .  All Maryland Reptile Show - May 01, 2021 . . . . . . . . . . 

full banner - advertise here .50¢/1000 views
Turtles & Tortoises for sale online
pool banner - $50 year

RE: C. bottae taxonomy

[ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Taxonomy Discussion ] [ Reply To This Message ]
[ Register to Post ]

Posted by: batrachos at Thu Apr 3 20:56:01 2008  [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by batrachos ]  
   

First a disclaimer- I am not a taxonomist, and I am not particularly familiar with rosy boas. I'm just throwing out some ideas here.

You draw a connection here between size and relatedness, but this is not necessarily the case. I can see a few scenarios that would result in the conflict between MtDNA and morphological data.

1). The adult size of these snakes is non-genetic. The 'dwarf forms' simply live in a habitat that causes them to remain small. A number of factors could lead to this: prey is scarce or of poor quality; seasonal activity is limited; larger individuals are selectively preyed upon; individuals breed at small size or early age, diverting nutrients from growth; etc. Thus the two lineages are affected by the same factors in the southern mountains. Perhaps if the southern lineage reached farther north, it would also show regional variation in size.


2). The adult size of these snakes is genetic, but small size has evolved in parallel in the southern lineage and in southern populations of the northern lineage. Similar selective factors have resulted in similar phenotypes.

3). The converse of (2)- The adult size of these snakes is genetic, but small size is the ancestral state. Some populations of the northern lineage have evolved to larger size.

4.) The adult size of these snakes is genetic, and represents a primary division between a dwarf lineage and a large lineage. This is in actual conflict with the MtDNA data and could result in different taxonomic conclusions. Perhaps the MtDNA was skewed by incomplete sorting of mitochondrial lineages due to a recent divergence between these two lineages, or represents an earlier incomplete divergence between two lineages, followed by subsequent partial reintegration and redivergence.

5.) The converse of (4)- the southern and small northern snakes are evidence of an older incomplete divergence.

Taxonomy really has no way to deal with (4) and (5); only one split is important, the most recent one. So the following taxonomic schemes would be suitable:

Scenario 1:

Charina "Northern"
Charina "Southern"

Scenario 2:

Charina "Northern"
-----"Northern Large"
-----"Northern Small"
Charina "Southern"

Scenario 3:

same as 2

Scenario 4:

Charina "Large"
Charina "Small"

Scenario 5:

Charina "Northern"
Charina "Southern"


   

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ]


>> Next Message:  RE: C. bottae taxonomy - RichardFHoyer, Fri Apr 4 20:31:18 2008
>> Next Message:  RE: C. bottae taxonomy - CKing, Sat Apr 19 06:17:16 2008

<< Previous Message:  C. bottae taxonomy - RichardFHoyer, Thu Mar 27 21:04:19 2008