return to main index

  mobile - desktop
follow us on facebook follow us on twitter follow us on YouTube link to us on LinkedIn
Southwestern Center for Herpetological Research  
Click here for LLL Reptile & Supply
This Space Available
3 months for $50.00
Locate a business by name: click to list your business
search the classifieds. buy an account
events by zip code list an event
Search the forums             Search in:
News & Events: Herp Photo of the Day: False Coral Snake . . . . . . . . . .  Herp Photo of the Day: Bearded Dragon . . . . . . . . . .  Greater Cincinnati Herp Society Meeting - Apr 02, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  Calusa Herp Society Meeting - Apr 04, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  Southwestern Herp Society Meeting - Apr 06, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  Hamburg Reptile Show - Apr. 13, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  St. Louis Herpetological Society - Apr 14, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  San Diego Herp Society Meeting - Apr 16, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  Suncoast Herp Society Meeting - Apr 20, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  DFW Herp Society Meeting - Apr 20, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  Colorado Herp Society Meeting - Apr 20, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  Chicago Herpetological Society Meeting - Apr 21, 2024 . . . . . . . . . . 
Join USARK - Fight for your rights!
full banner - advertise here .50¢/1000 views
click here for Rodent Pro
pool banner - $50 year

RE: Polyphyletic or Paraphyletic?

[ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Taxonomy Discussion ] [ Reply To This Message ]
[ Register to Post ]

Posted by: CKing at Mon Sep 29 12:34:38 2008  [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by CKing ]  
   

>>>>Actually, there is no circumstance in which a group that consists of only birds and frogs (and nothing else) could be considered paraphyletic, so it is not necessary to be ambiguous.
>>
>>The other circumstances I suggested would include OTHER TAXA.>>

In this case, it is clear from the beginning that no other taxa are involved.

>> This particular case is clear.>>

Absolutely, and that is what I said. There is no circumstance in which a group that consists of only birds and frogs (and nothing else) could be considered paraphyletic.

>> But sometimes it is unclear whether a grouping is paraphyletic or polyphyletic.>>

That is hard to believe. A group is paraphyletic if it shares a nearest common ancestor. If it does not share a nearest common ancestor, then it is polyphyletic. If you do not know whether it is polyphyletic or paraphyletic, then you also do not know whether it is monophyletic or not. Hence a cladist cannot claim that he/she knows anything in such a case. To then suggest that such a group is "not monophyletic" is to assert what is not actually known.

>> Under those circumstances the use of the term non-monophyletic is completely appropriate, not "dishonest".>>

I disagree. It is not only dishonest, but also unscientific because science is based on the available evidence. To go ahead and disqualify taxa on the basis of such lack of evidence would be tragic and also not scientific.

>>You sure have a big ship on your shoulder, CKing.>>

To assert that I have a chip on my shoulder is to assert the unknown. That is again not scientific.


   

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ]


>> Next Message:  RE: Polyphyletic or Paraphyletic? - emoneill, Mon Sep 29 19:45:36 2008

<< Previous Message:  RE: Polyphyletic or Paraphyletic? - emoneill, Mon Sep 29 08:57:56 2008