amazondoc,

Tom is plenty credible. Credibility comes from much more than being a smart a**. So maybe you read peer reviewed articles and regurgitate the facts stated therein, but that tells us little about your about your personal character and insight. It is amusing that you are pointing out any small error that someone may have stated, but I don't see much evidence that you have a grasp of the big picture at hand. The debate is really about whether the government employees and interest groups are approaching ecological management using "best practice". It seems quite evident to me that the recent attacks on the 9 species of large constrictors may be clouding the insight of those paid by our tax money. As Tom was clearly trying to state, if they want to regulate "injurious species" they might be best advised to increase their attention on the more prominent species such as "Felis silvestris catus". His statement is credible, as is Tom.

You must still be wet behind the ears
-----
steve

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ]