Posted by:
amazondoc
at Fri Feb 19 15:28:22 2010 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by amazondoc ]
>>"The estimated population has dwindled to no more than 300 - down dramatically from about 6,500 before 1984, when the rat was added to the federal endangered species list."
>>
>>"Development, the most prevalent threat to wildlife in Florida, certainly played a role in reducing the rat's prime habitat, but its most recent rapid decline, starting around 1995, happened with much of its remaining habitat under state and federal protection.The dire drop remains somewhat of a puzzle to scientists."
>>
>>
>>
>> Those are all interesting statements especially when looked at in the overall context of how things like "endangered" wood rats become instrumental as biological political tools ,That seem to pop up at opportunistic times. How many pythons have been found so far on Key largo?, and what's the total rat population estimated at 300?
Dunno!
>>
>>Do you have a name Amazondoc? Not that Ive looked hard but in skiming thru this thread and others , I haven't seen you post it.
I don't often post it on sites like this. Amongst other things, I get tired of explaining how to spell and pronounce it to people. But the name is "Ione" -- not "Lone", btw -- and it's pronounced "eye-own".  ----- ----
0.1 Peruvian rainbow boa (Amaru)
2.0 Brazilian rainbow boas (TBA)
0.3 Honduran milksnakes (Chicchan, Chanir, Hari)
1.0 Thayeri kingsnake (TBA)
2.7 corns (Cetto, Tolosa, TBA)
1,000,000.1,000,000 other critters
[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]
- not just one python eating woodrats - amazondoc, Fri Feb 19 01:18:18 2010

- Did the paper mention this to ? - wstreps, Fri Feb 19 07:38:10 2010

- RE: Did the paper mention this to ? - jscrick, Fri Feb 19 09:10:16 2010

- RE: Did the paper mention this to ? - amazondoc, Fri Feb 19 11:41:39 2010

- here is a copy of the article... - jscrick, Fri Feb 19 13:44:31 2010

- RE: here is a copy of the article... - jscrick, Fri Feb 19 14:11:24 2010

- RE: Did the paper mention this to ? - WSTREPS, Fri Feb 19 14:29:07 2010

- RE: here is a copy of the article... - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Fri Feb 19 15:13:15 2010

- RE: here is a copy of the article... - amazondoc, Fri Feb 19 15:24:48 2010

RE: Did the paper mention this to ? - amazondoc, Fri Feb 19 15:28:22 2010 
- oh, I found her -- - amazondoc, Fri Feb 19 15:32:30 2010

- and..... - amazondoc, Fri Feb 19 15:36:20 2010

- RE: oh, I found her -- - joshhutto, Fri Feb 19 15:57:04 2010

- RE: oh, I found her -- - amazondoc, Fri Feb 19 16:23:01 2010

- RE: and..... - jscrick, Fri Feb 19 17:06:10 2010

- RE: and..... - amazondoc, Fri Feb 19 20:20:29 2010

- another question for amazondoc - jscrick, Fri Feb 19 21:44:06 2010

- Further... - brhaco, Fri Feb 19 21:51:18 2010

- RE: Did the paper mention this to ? - Jaykis, Fri Feb 19 22:52:14 2010

- How many.... - Jaykis, Fri Feb 19 22:58:02 2010

- RE: How many.... - brhaco, Fri Feb 19 23:18:39 2010

- RE: Did the paper mention this to ? - amazondoc, Sat Feb 20 01:04:24 2010

- RE: another question for amazondoc - amazondoc, Sat Feb 20 01:09:44 2010

- RE: oh, I found her -- - WSTREPS, Sat Feb 20 07:23:07 2010

- RE: oh, I found her -- - jscrick, Sat Feb 20 07:33:02 2010

- RE: How many.... - cychluraguy, Sat Feb 20 07:39:37 2010

- WHAT, I CAN'T HERE YOU - brd, Sat Feb 20 11:34:50 2010

- RE: WHAT, I CAN'T HERE YOU - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Sat Feb 20 12:29:31 2010

|