>>There was NO jump to any conclusion only me reading what you posted and suggesting the results might be skewed because of a lack of knowledge by the authors and explaining why. You were thrown into the mix only because it's not likely you would know about "sperm retention" either. I'm likely right on that as you said nothing that would rule it out until you posted the entire abstract. I'm sorry you took that as an attack but what I did was very CLOSE to what you do to a lot of people including me. If the heat is too much perhaps the kitchen is not a place for you to hang out in...The entire post was questioning your post and the researchers conclusions...DEJA VU perhaps...LOL



Tom, your ongoing personal attacks are getting really really old. I have been ignoring most of them up to now, because they are usually just feeble attempts to distract from the points of the discussions when the debates aren't going your way. And I have not engaged in all the insult slinging myself, because I am good enough at using facts and logic that I don't need to insult my opponent in order to get my point across. Attempts at character assassination are known as the refuges of the weak.



I will not tell you here just how ridiculous your claims are that it's "not likely you would know about sperm retention", because then you would just accuse me of bragging. I am sorry that you are upset enough about being proven wrong yet again that you are resorting to more and more feeble gibes to make yourself feel better, but I can't say that I'm really all that surprised about it. Those attacks say a lot more about you than they do about me.



And now I'll go back to ignoring them.
-----
----



0.1 Peruvian rainbow boa (Amaru)

2.0 Brazilian rainbow boas (TBA)

0.3 Honduran milksnakes (Chicchan, Chanir, Hari)

1.0 Thayeri kingsnake (TBA)

2.7 corns (Cetto, Tolosa, TBA)

1,000,000.1,000,000 other critters

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ]