Posted by:
cychluraguy
at Thu Mar 25 18:10:50 2010 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by cychluraguy ]
Mike,
As the Everglades I was prety much including all "natural" areas below lake O that is also about the limit of berms living sucessfuly for the long run.
The question of ssp. is a complicated one mainly because most ssp's have been determined by visual caracteristics and how much they are different genticaly may be little or none. Most animals that are geographicly isolated for even a few hundred years with no "new blood" added will change enough to look or be new ssp. I have often thought if a scientist who had never seen or heard of a dog was doing the taxonomy of them hew many sp and ssp would they come up with. Because we know the history of them we we say they are all the same. The iguanas on the islands in the sea of cortez are believed to be released by indians long ago from the mainland but have enough physical differences now to be a different ssp. Think about if I took a banana cal king back in time 200 years and let it go on catalina island today we would probobly consider it a new sp visualy after only 30 years of selective breeding.
Just a few thought about the whole ssp thing.
If you want to include ssp to make it easy just include animals that would be affected by bermese pythons since that is the main focus of the topic and seperate sp from ssp
Rob
[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]
- 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - Upscale, Tue Mar 23 21:08:38 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - brd, Tue Mar 23 21:22:56 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - lep1pic1, Tue Mar 23 22:27:49 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - spmoberl, Wed Mar 24 00:05:58 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - DanielsDen, Wed Mar 24 08:13:40 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - Upscale, Wed Mar 24 08:59:11 2010

- 60% Survival rate?? - steelersdiehard, Wed Mar 24 09:08:42 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - Mike_Rochford, Wed Mar 24 09:28:58 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - Upscale, Wed Mar 24 09:31:50 2010

- Certain;y not... - jscrick, Wed Mar 24 09:44:53 2010

- certainly possible... - jscrick, Wed Mar 24 09:52:03 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - steelersdiehard, Wed Mar 24 10:26:39 2010

- RE: certainly possible... - mavericksdad, Wed Mar 24 10:32:37 2010

- RE: show me the bodies - Calparsoni, Wed Mar 24 10:44:03 2010

- DO NOT APPOLOGIZE - brd, Wed Mar 24 11:07:01 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - tropicherper, Wed Mar 24 12:45:26 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - lep1pic1, Wed Mar 24 13:51:19 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - cychluraguy, Wed Mar 24 14:31:38 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - Mike_Rochford, Wed Mar 24 15:01:04 2010

- Thank you. - Mike_Rochford, Wed Mar 24 15:09:18 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - Mike_Rochford, Wed Mar 24 15:32:44 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - cychluraguy, Wed Mar 24 16:02:47 2010

- RE: DO NOT APPOLOGIZE - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Wed Mar 24 16:09:51 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - WSTREPS, Wed Mar 24 16:21:19 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Wed Mar 24 16:34:13 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - Upscale, Wed Mar 24 16:56:56 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - lep1pic1, Wed Mar 24 17:02:09 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - Mike_Rochford, Wed Mar 24 17:07:14 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - varanid, Wed Mar 24 17:18:03 2010

- Thanks Mike and Frank - steelersdiehard, Wed Mar 24 17:44:36 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - lep1pic1, Wed Mar 24 19:08:03 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - jscrick, Wed Mar 24 20:39:09 2010

- Busterlyme disease???? - Calparsoni, Wed Mar 24 20:53:51 2010

- RE: certainly possible... - thecrocpot, Thu Mar 25 04:59:51 2010

- RE: certainly possible... - jscrick, Thu Mar 25 08:51:11 2010

- Introduced species... - Ravenspirit, Thu Mar 25 09:44:33 2010

- RE: Introduced species... - cychluraguy, Thu Mar 25 11:09:17 2010

- RE: Introduced species... - brd, Thu Mar 25 12:12:17 2010

- RE: Introduced species... - cychluraguy, Thu Mar 25 12:19:59 2010

- RE: Introduced species... - brd, Thu Mar 25 12:25:59 2010

- RE: Introduced species.. TOM And MIKE - cychluraguy, Thu Mar 25 12:26:58 2010

- RE: Introduced species... - cychluraguy, Thu Mar 25 12:31:53 2010

- RE: Introduced species.. TOM And MIKE - Mike_Rochford, Thu Mar 25 13:40:35 2010

- RE: Introduced species.. TOM And MIKE - BRhaco, Thu Mar 25 14:20:24 2010

- RE: Introduced species.. TOM And MIKE - lep1pic1, Thu Mar 25 17:00:10 2010

RE: Introduced species.. TOM And MIKE - cychluraguy, Thu Mar 25 18:10:50 2010 
- RE: Introduced species.. TOM And MIKE - Ravenspirit, Thu Mar 25 22:47:59 2010

- Raccoons on Key Biscayne - Jaykis, Fri Mar 26 19:41:07 2010

- RE: Raccoons on Key Biscayne - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Fri Mar 26 20:53:08 2010

- RE: Raccoons on Key Biscayne - Calparsoni, Sat Mar 27 00:10:53 2010

- RE: Raccoons on Key Biscayne - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Sun Mar 28 11:12:15 2010

- RE: Raccoons on Key Biscayne - kachunga, Tue Mar 30 14:26:46 2010

- RE: Raccoons on Key Biscayne - jscrick, Tue Mar 30 21:10:13 2010

- RE: Raccoons on Key Biscayne - Calparsoni, Tue Mar 30 22:32:13 2010

|