Posted by:
Snakesunlimited1
at Wed Sep 29 08:59:14 2010 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Snakesunlimited1 ]
HAHA The big difference between a manufacturing company sharing it's info and a breeder is materials. I can go buy the materials to copy your product design but I can not go buy the animals to make a lucy!! So how is it jealousy and attempted theft?? If this is a super form as is suggested then there is a whole other level of mutation involved that nobody has. If the animals were available to produce these then we would see more of them. This is a first because the animals are not available in the first place unless GCR's sells them to you. So your statement has no bearing in reality with either of your points. Not to mention that ATB's are not a "production" type animal in the first place.
Secrecy leads to distrust and in turn a lower dollar and smaller market place to try and sell your animal. This amount of questioning comments comes from the fact that this is not the first time that they have claimed to have a new PROVEN morph and then failed to produce any backing evidence. The questions from the get go from most people is 1) are there more litter mates, 2) what do the parents look like, and 3) what do the litter mates look like? There was or maybe still is a lucy cottonmouth that was produced in a zoo from a lone animal that never saw another of it's kind. That lucy is not a new morph, it is a freak occurrence.
Jason
[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]
|