mobile - desktop |
3 months for $50.00 |
News & Events:
|
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ]
[ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Rubber Boas ] [ Reply To This Message ] [ Register to Post ] |
Posted by: ALT at Fri Jul 1 10:02:45 2011 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by ALT ] Thank you for the detailed response, Richard. I'll keep an eye out for new phylogeography papers. While I haven't really dug into the rubber boa literature, I'll agree with you on the opinion that the taxonomy stuff was premature. MtDNA studies are great for investigating intraspecific biogeographic patterns, you need good nuclear marker sampling and great range-wide geographic sampling as well before you can make any reliable statements regarding taxonomy. It was far too common in the past for studies to run off renaming/revising species and subspecies before obtaining robust enough sampling to know whether morphological variation was a gradient across the range or true fixed differences between populations. The field has come a long way in the last decade in understanding the pitfalls of interpreting a gene tree as a species tree as well. Good to hear someone is out there trying to sort things out with the rubber boas. [ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ] | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: Rubber worms! - RichardFHoyer, Fri Jul 1 00:01:33 2011 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|