"This is the point. YOU may be the only one in the US that doesn’t think there is a controversy. Do you know what the word controversy means? Controversy = dispute. It takes TWO to have a dispute. Do you deny your claim is disputed by well respected alterna people familiar with the area? "



Actually isn't that the point? I don't believe there is a controversy because I know the truth. Truth does not equal controversy. It may be disputed, but dispute doesn't make my experience false does it? Do you equate the 'controversy' with any of the examples you listed previously? There may be some disbelief or question about how my animals could have been captured in the area where they were captured, but until it is proven otherwise, it is just speculation. The fact remains that no one else has spent any time hunting where I collected these individuals (and frankly I wouldn't have either) and until they do and find another animal there, then it is unlikely anyone will be convinced - or frankly I would assume that even if they did, they would be doubted as well, correct? I guess I'll just have to hope that for whatever reason YOU decide to focus on that area and that you find one there, right? LOL. But then I guess your honesty will then be in question so I suggest that you don't tell anyone even if you do catch one. I would contend that persons should be given the benefit of the doubt unless and until they are proven to be liars.

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]