mobile - desktop |
3 months for $50.00 |
News & Events:
|
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ]
[ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Herp Law Center & Forum ] [ Reply To This Message ] [ Register to Post ] |
Posted by: Aaron at Wed Nov 16 11:41:01 2011 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Aaron ] Usually the law defines the terminology it uses. That's exactly what this law does. It defines dangerous exotic as any constricting snake. So there is no question about what the legal definition is in this case. It's not that we don't understand the legal definition, it's that we disagree with it. It is what we should do, argue that the legal definition they are using is flawed. [ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ] | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: Ohio bans all "constrictor" snakes - StephF, Mon Oct 24 15:41:47 2011 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|