mobile - desktop |
Available Now at RodentPro.com! |
News & Events:
|
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ]
[ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Herp Law Center & Forum ] [ Reply To This Message ] [ Register to Post ] |
Posted by: Aaron at Tue Nov 15 20:45:58 2011 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Aaron ] I would argue that keeping wild animals reflects a need to contact nature and therefore contributes to a basic human need. It is not the only way but it is one way to have a contact with nature in todays industrialized nations. Where there is not an explicit reason to prevent it I think it should be encouraged or at least allowed. If it's going cost more to enact and enforce unecessary regulations than it would to enact and enforce reasonable ones that's good reason to spend a little money on research. [ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]
| ||
>> Next topic: Reptiles vs exotic animals - EricWI, Sat Oct 29 03:49:31 2011 << Previous topic: Ohio bans all "constrictor" snakes - EricWI, Sat Oct 22 13:21:50 2011 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|