mobile - desktop |
3 months for $50.00 |
News & Events:
|
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ]
[ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Herp Law Center & Forum ] [ Reply To This Message ] [ Register to Post ] |
Posted by: Aaron at Wed Nov 16 11:18:23 2011 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Aaron ] That's absolutely ludicrous. We don't make rules extra nonsensical simply because we are mad at one person, or one type of person. We are not talking about extra tuff rules here. We are talking about nonsensical rules. Banning "any type of constricting snake" is not an extra tuff rule. It's a nonsensical rule because it seeks to ban something that poses no danger. We don't ban nondangerous animals to show how tuff we are on dangerous animals. [ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]
| ||
>> Next topic: SSA: Snakes in the Capitol - EricWI, Thu Nov 17 10:51:09 2011 << Previous topic: Middleton WI t Consider wild animal ban - EricWI, Tue Nov 8 03:46:07 2011 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|