The story is more than a little misleading...so what's new, eh? I know for a fact there were alot more than 20 letters/emails opposing the ban that went to ODNR (Ohio Department of Natural Resources) when the "recommendations" were being drafted. I, and some of my contacts, personally sent more than 20. I had communications with ODNR almost daily for a period of time. So to say "the governor's office" received such little opposition to the ban is to understate/ignore the communications that were going through the channels that the govenor's office directed us to use...

Very misleading...poor reporting...but again...what's new?

Mark

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ]