Posted by:
ccphoto
at Wed Sep 26 10:10:01 2012 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by ccphoto ]
haha. I see your point - candy stripe isn't the greatest name either for description. I think you should get to name the trait and I like the name wipeout for the trait... the "hets" seem to wipe away normal patterning. I see Warren's point as well though... there are so many random names in BPs and Bc that it's impossible to hear a trait name and figure out what it'd look like without seeing it... Huffman's, Camo, Russo, Lace... you get the point.
I would like to see you breed them back to see if there is a homozygous form of the morph, if it is indeed a dominant trait.
It is possible that the wipeouts are the homozygous expression of a recessive trait correct? I ask because I haven't seen the sire and dam. ----- Chris Carille
Marist College, NY
Department of Biology
Chris Carille Photography - carillephoto.com
Garden of Eden Exotics - edenexotics.weebly.com
http://nyexotics.blogspot.com/
[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ]
|