Posted by:
Chris_McMartin
at Fri Dec 28 08:29:30 2012 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Chris_McMartin ]
"While the named Plaintiffs may be responsible dangerous wild animal owners, there are some that are not," the ruling said.
Replace "dangerous wild animal" with "gun" or "automobile" or pretty much anything else.
This ruling is intellectually/logically/legally lazy and a dangerous precedent insofar as liberty is concerned.
It's the "One person wets their pants, and everyone has to wear diapers" mentality.
-----
Chris McMartin
www.mcmartinville.com
[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]
|
Dangerous Precedent? - Chris_McMartin, Fri Dec 28 08:29:30 2012
