I never claimed to be doing any kind of work with snake venom. I am however quite aware of the different delivery systems, and you are in fact very much regurgitating facts that someone else TOLD you. Doesnt this go along with Franks theory on recipe husbandry? You have no scientific merit to your statements.



Im not refuting the fact that in the hobby we consider hognose rear fanged venomous. That is only because we dont have a classification called rear fanged toxic, potentially harmful. They are not venomous by definition, and I am tired of people trying to spread this misinformation. Does it take away from the potential threat they can cause? No, did I at all imply it did? No. I simply stated most of you guys use the wrong words, or you use the words interchangeably and its just not proper. Did I say you were incorrect about your statements? No I did not, that is for another topic. I simply stated they are not by zoological definition venomous rear fanged, or otherwise.



Your reply came off very condescending. My reply wasnt directed at you, or anyone in particular for that matter, it was aimed at everyone. I was even nice about it. I didnt even comment on what you continue to spread as fact when most of what you are saying, you read on a forum somewhere. Simple as it is, you are defending incorrect information if you keep on with the mindset they are venomous. What field of study is your scientific knowledge in? I say knowledge because it is quite obvious you are in no way shape or form, formally educated in the matter.



Good day friend

Will Wohlers

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]