return to main index

  mobile - desktop
follow us on facebook follow us on twitter follow us on YouTube link to us on LinkedIn
International Reptile Conservation Foundation  
click here for Rodent Pro
This Space Available
3 months for $50.00
Locate a business by name: click to list your business
search the classifieds. buy an account
events by zip code list an event
Search the forums             Search in:
News & Events: Herp Photo of the Day: False Coral Snake . . . . . . . . . .  Herp Photo of the Day: Bearded Dragon . . . . . . . . . .  Greater Cincinnati Herp Society Meeting - Apr 02, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  Calusa Herp Society Meeting - Apr 04, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  Southwestern Herp Society Meeting - Apr 06, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  Hamburg Reptile Show - Apr. 13, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  St. Louis Herpetological Society - Apr 14, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  San Diego Herp Society Meeting - Apr 16, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  Suncoast Herp Society Meeting - Apr 20, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  DFW Herp Society Meeting - Apr 20, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  Colorado Herp Society Meeting - Apr 20, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  Chicago Herpetological Society Meeting - Apr 21, 2024 . . . . . . . . . . 
Join USARK - Fight for your rights!
full banner - advertise here .50¢/1000 views
click here for Rodent Pro
pool banner - $50 year

RE: Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more...

[ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Taxonomy Discussion ] [ Reply To This Message ]
[ Register to Post ]

Posted by: WW at Sun Nov 23 15:02:33 2003  [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by WW ]  
   

>>If someone decides to revise a particular taxon, they write a paper....then...
>>
>>firstly how does it get published? Who do they have to go to? What happens then, does it get reviewed or just deemed correct??

The normal procedure would be to publish any taxonomic revision in a peer-reviewed journal. In this case, the manuscript gets sent to the editor of the journal, who then identifies two-three other researchers with expertise in the taxon under study and/or the methods used. The manuscript is then sent to them, and they write a report on the paper, which will point out any flaws and make suggestions for improvements, and a recommendation to the editor, which can be along the lines of "accept as is" (rare), "accept subject to minor improvements", "reject but invite resubmission of considerably modified manuscript" (which is then reviewed again to ensure that the necessary improvements have been made), or outright rejection. The editor would normally study the reviewers' reports and recommendations and plump for one of these options.

>>If a paper is published and is released, does it make it right? What about the papers before that?

No paper changes biological reality. If a paper is based on convincing evidence, then most workers in the field will accept it, if it is weak (due to poor methods, sampling, interpretation, whatever), then most won't. There is no strict obligation to accept any published paper - anyone is free to reject teh conclusions. However, doing so without good reason and without new evidence tends to leave you in a small minority if the paper was sound in methods and conclusions.

>>For example, A.Tokar was the last person to write a paper on Eryx jaculus. I wholeheartedly disagee with him, and I feel he has not looked at the specimens from such a broad range. I currently keep several jaculus sp. of differing ranges, and at a minimum they deserve subspecies recognition, if not full species. So....does it make it right?

Like I said, it does not change biological reality. However, the question is, what other evidence is available that contradicts his paper? Even if his paper was not brilliant, its conclusions will probably be accepted if nothing better has been done. On the other hand, in other cases, a number of authors do good work, but disagree in their interpretations, so in that case, one may not be followed by the majority.

Hope this clairifies.

Cheers,

Wolfgang
-----
WW Home


   

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ]


>> Next Message:  RE: Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more... - reptileheaven, Sun Nov 23 15:46:16 2003

<< Previous Message:  Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more... - reptileheaven, Sun Nov 23 11:12:26 2003