return to main index

  mobile - desktop
follow us on facebook follow us on twitter follow us on YouTube link to us on LinkedIn
 
click here for Rodent Pro
This Space Available
3 months for $50.00
Locate a business by name: click to list your business
search the classifieds. buy an account
events by zip code list an event
Search the forums             Search in:
News & Events: Herp Photo of the Day: Happy Rattlesnake Friday! . . . . . . . . . .  Herp Photo of the Day: Frog . . . . . . . . . .  Southwestern Herp Society Meeting - Apr 05, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Kentucky Reptile Expo - Apr. 12, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  St. Louis Herpetological Society - Apr 13, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  San Diego Herp Society Meeting - Apr 15, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Colorado Herp Society Meeting - Apr 19, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Chicago Herpetological Society Meeting - Apr 20, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Bay Area Herpetological Society Meeting - Apr 25, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Suncoast Herp Society Meeting - Apr 26, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  DFW Herp Society Meeting - Apr 26, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Calusa Herp Society Meeting - May 01, 2025 . . . . . . . . . . 
Southwestern Center for Herpetological Research
full banner - advertise here .50¢/1000 views
click here for Rodent Pro
pool banner - $50 year

RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?

[ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Taxonomy Discussion ] [ Reply To This Message ]
[ Register to Post ]

Posted by: ScottThomson at Fri Jan 2 00:19:34 2004  [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by ScottThomson ]  
   

"A taxonomist who tolerates paraphyletic taxa, for example, may recognize a paraphyletic Clemmys for the 4 North American species of emydid turtles, whereas a Hennigian may splinter the 4 species of Clemmys into two or more genera. This is the case because taxonomy is independent of systematic methodology."

If splitting them is problematic because you cannot tell them apart why not lump them? It is a valid means of dealing with paraphyly and should be looked at as an equal option as splitting. Then the most appropriate course taken.

As we did for the E. macquarii group, we got rid of E. signata, E. krefftii and a host of subspecies. Put them all in one taxa with just four subspecies.

Cheers, Scott


   

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ]


<< Previous Message:  RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress? - CKing, Thu Jan 1 23:34:33 2004