mobile - desktop |
Available Now at RodentPro.com! |
News & Events:
|
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ]
[ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Taxonomy Discussion ] [ Reply To This Message ] [ Register to Post ] |
Posted by: CKing at Thu Dec 18 04:34:48 2003 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by CKing ] I agree that names are unimportant. It is the evidence that counts. If there is little or no evidence for a proposed change or if the change does not do any good (e.g. to satisfy the ideological intolerance of parpahyletic taxa) then the proposal ought to be rejected. [ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ] | ||
>> Next Message: RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes - wulf, Thu Dec 18 06:59:15 2003 | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes - WW, Thu Dec 18 04:08:30 2003 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|