Hi Ray,

BTW Wulf, thanks for your agreement that the idea of lumping the various Australiasian pythons into a single genus is wrong. That corroborates the mindest of both myself and Richard Wells, who on this point (I think) speak with a united front.

Your welcome Ray!

I'm happy I could bring you both together in this particular case as in other respects you more tend to smash each others heads I never have agreed to Underwood & Stimpson's arrangement though and some of their character sets for specific taxa are simply identified wrong due to the unsuitable samples and limited sample size.

Ray, as I told you before, I tend to partly accept the arrangements you've made, but you use the wrong scientific methods and support no evidence in most parts of your papers. So they aren't really convincing (not only to me). It's nothing personal anyway.

Cheers,
Wulf
-----
http://www.leiopython.de ,
http://www.herpers-digest.com

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ]