Some of you(you) seem to thing of this as a, word problem. Like, lets take your this, and his that, and the others that too and that would be all good. Well, you could be right.



The problem is, that would work if all the approaches had results. There is the problem, they argue without results.

Without results, how do you consider a method or approach? In fact, what are their methods and approach with captive monitors? Have they listed them? Have they shown them(pics) of them? They argue UV bulbs, as far as I know, that is only one little tool of husbandry, not a method. They have not even shown results of that. I have for regular bulbs. To be of use, we should really show results.



If you really do not care about results, thats fine too. Only I will ring up Jeff Barringer and have him rename this forum, Theoretical husbandry of captive monitors.



IF they showed tangible results and they were comparable to mine or superior, I would not debate them, I would steal them and use them as my own. As thats my method, use what works. Not use what I think should work. Thanks FR

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]