Posted by:
McNasty78
at Sat Dec 11 00:26:50 2004 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by McNasty78 ]
If a large burm were to bite someone on the back of the hand, it would *not* cause deep puncture wounds, lacerations, penetrate blood vessels, or sever/injure tendons or nerves? The said person would *not* possibly have to seek medical attention for the injury. The person also would *not* have lasting effects from the bite?
[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]
- I'm not talking about being wrapped either... - McNasty78, Fri Dec 10 11:50:51 2004
- RE: I'm not talking about being wrapped either... - Goauld, Fri Dec 10 17:46:27 2004
- "to your EYES"?!?!?!!? WHAT? - McNasty78, Fri Dec 10 21:04:28 2004
- RE: "to your EYES"?!?!?!!? WHAT? - Goauld, Sat Dec 11 18:13:20 2004
- Serious issues... - McNasty78, Sat Dec 11 19:40:40 2004
- RE: Serious issues... - Goauld, Sat Dec 11 22:52:15 2004
- Try reading.. - Goauld, Sat Dec 11 22:55:40 2004
- Nice - McNasty78, Sun Dec 12 04:40:27 2004
- RE: Nice - GreggMM, Sun Dec 12 07:00:51 2004
- Well. - McNasty78, Sun Dec 12 07:23:10 2004
- RE: Well. - GreggMM, Sun Dec 12 08:24:27 2004
- Agreed - McNasty78, Sun Dec 12 09:17:32 2004
- RE: Nice - Goauld, Sun Dec 12 13:36:43 2004
- Dear Sir. - McNasty78, Sun Dec 12 14:11:35 2004
- another comparison and the potential infection - nhherp, Fri Dec 10 23:35:55 2004
|
So you're saying.... - McNasty78, Sat Dec 11 00:26:50 2004
