![]() | mobile - desktop |
![]() |
![]() |
News & Events:
|
|
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ]
[ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Taxonomy Discussion ] [ Reply To This Message ] [ Register to Post ] |
Posted by: CoralSnake at Tue Jun 7 23:56:10 2005 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by CoralSnake ] One thing that suprises me about Evolutionists is that most of them even the Cladists stick to fixed "Creationist" ideas about Taxonomy. As a forinstance an Elapid must be a snake with short relatively immobile front fangs (the "protoroglyphous" condition). A viperid must be a snake with long front fangs on a swinging maxilary bone (the "solenoglyphous" condition). [ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]
| ||
>> Next topic: Plestiodon or Eumeces? - HaroldD, Fri Jun 10 20:20:44 2005 << Previous topic: Colubrid venoms, Opheodrys, etc. - nekomi, Wed Jun 1 13:21:38 2005 | ||
|
|
|
|