return to main index

  mobile - desktop
follow us on facebook follow us on twitter follow us on YouTube link to us on LinkedIn
International Reptile Conservation Foundation  
Click here for LLL Reptile & Supply
This Space Available
3 months for $50.00
Locate a business by name: click to list your business
search the classifieds. buy an account
events by zip code list an event
Search the forums             Search in:
News & Events: Herp Photo of the Day: Bearded Dragon . . . . . . . . . .  Tinley Reflections: An open letter from Mom . . . . . . . . . .  Greater Cincinnati Herp Society Meeting - Apr 02, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  Calusa Herp Society Meeting - Apr 04, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  Southwestern Herp Society Meeting - Apr 06, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  Hamburg Reptile Show - Apr. 13, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  St. Louis Herpetological Society - Apr 14, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  San Diego Herp Society Meeting - Apr 16, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  Suncoast Herp Society Meeting - Apr 20, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  DFW Herp Society Meeting - Apr 20, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  Colorado Herp Society Meeting - Apr 20, 2024 . . . . . . . . . .  Chicago Herpetological Society Meeting - Apr 21, 2024 . . . . . . . . . . 
Southwestern Center for Herpetological Research
full banner - advertise here .50¢/1000 views
click here for Rodent Pro
pool banner - $50 year

RE: another try: Sibling species...

[ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Taxonomy Discussion ] [ Reply To This Message ]
[ Register to Post ]

Posted by: cking at Fri Nov 18 00:32:10 2005  [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by cking ]  
   

Wulf wrote:

"Hello folks,

as far as I have learned, sibling species are (morphologically) indistinguishable from (a certain) other species. But in fact, "sibling species" are no valid taxonomic entity, but I have read some papers regarding such as separate sub- or full species."

Me:
Sibling species are simply just that, siblings. That means they share a more recent common ancestor than they do with other species. An example of 2 sibling species would be the common chimp and the pygmy chimp. Sibling species are not necessarily morphologically indistinguishable from one another, although they tend to be morphologically similar in many cases.

"I understand that even allopatric populations are not always considered a subspecies or at specific rank, at least if morphologically indistinguishable from the 'nominate species'. Although this was commonly done in the past.
So, what is to do with allopatric species that are indistinguishable from a certain other species."

Me:
Allopatry is a poor determinant of species distinctness. A much better and universally accepted criterion is reproductive isolation.

Wulf:
"Doesn't allopatry also mean not having gene flow, a reduced gene pool and therefore eventually the development of certain characters (due to environmental factors)?"

Me:
True. Allopatry means that two populations that are geographically isolated from each other will each develop their own unique alleles. This is a process known as genetic drift. Some biologists suggest that the presence of such unique alleles is evidence that the two populations are different species. As Ernst Mayr pointed out, however, systematists want to classify organisms on the basis of evolutionary changes, not neutral genetic drift.

Wulf:
"If so, any allopatric population would become a subspecies and later perhaps a species over time, and could definitly be considered as sibling species prior to subspecific or specific level?"

Me:
That is the rationale that some would use to suggest that two allopatric populations, if they are going to drift apart, might as well be recognized as distinct species NOW. That too is absurd because no one can predict the future. These two populations may become extinct before either or both of them have evolved into a different species. Or they may meet again and then interbreed freely sometime in the future. Many of the island populations off the coast of California, for example, may come in contact with mainland populations during the next ice age. Many of them have become isolated from mainland populations only since the end of the last ice age, about 12,000 years ago.
Therefore it would be wise not to regard allopatric populations as distinct species unless reproductive isolation can be demonstrated (premating isolation) or unless it can be shown that they are so different ecologically that a hybrid would be unlikely to survive in the wild (postmating reproductive isolation) because of reduced fitness.


   

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]


>> Next topic:  Graeme Gow has Died - richardwells, Tue Aug 16 06:06:41 2005
<< Previous topic:  Plestiodon or Eumeces? - HaroldD, Fri Jun 10 20:20:44 2005