Well, if there were a number of different mutations that were alleles of the same gene only a maximum of two of them could be present. I guess thats one possible way that a mutation could be eliminated. Genes are paired so you could only have two mutations at a time that were alleles of a specific locus. Human blood type for instance. There are basically 4 different blood types. A, B, AB, and O. A and B are codominant to each other and O is recessive to both. The possible combinations are.

AA - Blood type A
AO - Blood type A
BB - Blood type B
BO - Blood type B
AB - Blood type AB
OO - Blood type O

There is only space for two types on the gene which is why you would never see a blood type of ABO. I guess in this way you could 'eliminate' a mutation. Does that make sense? I'm sorry if I explained it poorly, I'm certainly not an expert.

>>Is it possible when mixing two morphs for one gene to eliminate the other. For example ....
>>
>>If you bred a pastel to an albino
>>
>>You would assume that you would get normal het albinos and pastel het albinos. But what if the pastel gene somehow wiped out the albino gene. Or could it be possible that because of the pastel gene, some of the offspring wouldn't be het albino.
>>
>>This is all just threoretical - I'm sure it probably has to do with what allele the morph genes are on and the phase of the moon at conception.
>>
>>But the thought ran through my mine earlier while thinking about mixing morphs.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>-----
>>Tosha
>>
>>"Nihil facimus sed id bene facimus"
>>
>>
>>
>>11.42.0 Ball Python (Harry and Fluffy and gang)
>>1.0.0 Angolan Python (Anakin Skywalker)
>>0.0.1 Green Tree Python (Verdi - yeah I know but my kids love the book)
>>0.1.0 Bredls Python (Smurfette)
>>0.2.0 Feline (Pippen and Pandora)
>>0.0.1 Desert Tortoise (Pope John Paul aka JP )
>>2.2.1 Fish (1,2,3,4)
>>0.0.0 frogs rescued from pool skimmer

[ Hide Replies ]

• Stupid Question #2 (or is it 200, I've lost count) - toshamc, Sat Feb 25 14:58:37 2006
• Anything is Possible...More.. - JKBREPTILES, Sat Feb 25 15:26:24 2006
• Genetics Negating Genetics...... - JKBREPTILES, Sat Feb 25 15:29:10 2006
• RE: Genetics Negating Genetics...... - toshamc, Sat Feb 25 15:34:29 2006
• RE: Genetics Negating Genetics...... - LadyOhh, Sat Feb 25 15:54:45 2006
• Right .. more - RandyRemington, Sat Feb 25 21:10:29 2006
• RE: Stupid Question #2 (or is it 200, I've lost count) - 3dmike, Sat Feb 25 15:55:27 2006
• RE: Stupid Question #2 (or is it 200, I've lost count) - KATO, Sat Feb 25 18:30:37 2006
• RE: Stupid Question #2 (or is it 200, I've lost count) - toshamc, Sat Feb 25 18:40:49 2006
• RE: Stupid Question #2 (or is it 200, I've lost count) - MarkS, Sat Feb 25 22:31:03 2006
• NO - jyohe, Sun Feb 26 05:19:15 2006
• well..... - nita, Sun Feb 26 12:49:36 2006