I wasn't disputing what you do, I was simply pointing out to Rob, that there are small specialized zoos, that are AZA accredited that do the same thing Rob is aiming for. I mentioned Reptiland, simply because it is exactly that AND accredited. They don't pay a full time vet...they have a consulting vet. When I worked for them, I was never told that a vet had to be there 100% of the time. Is this a stipulation? I was never aware of it.

I agree many private collections are up the standards (and may even exceed them in many cases. Case and point, a few zoos here and there are adept at keeping bushmasters....However, there are several others that are downright LOUSY AT IT!).

While many of AZA's policies may not be all that great(Just how many ARUBA rattlesnakes have been released to date?) the underlying theme is that the care of animals is subject to peer review(inspections) and it does count for something. It doesn't just apply to zoos. Peer review in any profession/industry is a measure of the quality of the operation. It doesn't mean others can't live up to the same standards, BUT it does mean that a facility has or has not been subject to those standards. Until you're subject to them, it doesn't mean a thing in terms of professional recognition or standing.

MCH

[ Hide Replies ]

• Professional Accreditation? - heartmountain, Sat Mar 4 00:40:06 2006
• RE: Professional Accreditation? - Carmichael, Sat Mar 4 10:38:56 2006
• RE: Professional Accreditation? - rwh, Sat Mar 4 16:28:41 2006
• RE: Professional Accreditation? - heartmountain, Sat Mar 4 20:46:20 2006
• RE: Professional Accreditation? - Carmichael, Sat Mar 4 21:03:14 2006
• Future consideration... - TimCole, Sat Mar 4 21:26:20 2006
• RE: Future consideration... - heartmountain, Sat Mar 4 21:47:20 2006
• Rob.... - Matt Harris, Mon Mar 6 05:47:11 2006
• But at - TimCole, Mon Mar 6 10:50:16 2006
• RE: But at - Matt Harris, Mon Mar 6 11:34:17 2006
• RE: But at - TimCole, Mon Mar 6 11:41:48 2006
• RE: But at - Carmichael, Mon Mar 6 17:46:06 2006
• RE: But at - Matt Harris, Mon Mar 6 18:53:03 2006
• RE: But at - Carmichael, Mon Mar 6 19:23:17 2006
• vets - rwh, Mon Mar 6 18:12:45 2006
• RE: vets - Carmichael, Mon Mar 6 19:26:58 2006
• RE: Professional Accreditation? - rwh, Mon Mar 6 18:07:29 2006
• RE: Professional Accreditation? - Carmichael, Mon Mar 6 19:30:15 2006