OK going back and rereading your previous post let me correct a couple of things pastels are co-dom (they have a super or are het for super pastel if you prefer - not to be confused with a recessive het.) and Spiders are dominant (do not have a visual super) also a killer bee is not produced by breeding a super pastel to a Spider that would give you 50% bumbles, and pastels. It is produced by breeding either two bumbles or a bumble and a pastel. In essence it needs to get a pastel gene from both parents and a spider gene from at least one.

Does that clear it up or muddy it more? LOL
-----
Tosha

"Nihil facimus sed id bene facimus"



6.42.0 Ball Python (Harry and Fluffy and gang)
1.0.0 Angolan Python (Anakin Skywalker)
0.0.1 Green Tree Python (Verdi)
0.1.0 Bredls Python (Smurfette)
0.2.0 Feline (Pippen and Pandora)
0.0.1 Desert Tortoise (Pope John Paul aka JP )
2.2.1 Fish (1,2,3,4)
0.0.0 frogs rescued from pool skimmer
0.0.1 Lizard of unknown origin

[ Hide Replies ]

• Bumblebee vs Killerbee - ronin1360, Sun Mar 5 18:41:10 2006
• RE: Bumblebee vs Killerbee - toshamc, Sun Mar 5 18:45:14 2006
• RE: Bumblebee vs Killerbee - ronin1360, Sun Mar 5 18:47:45 2006
• RE: Bumblebee vs Killerbee - Randall_Turner, Sun Mar 5 19:07:35 2006
• RE: Bumblebee vs Killerbee - toshamc, Sun Mar 5 19:10:39 2006
• RE: Bumblebee bred to Super Pastel = - 3dmike, Sun Mar 5 19:41:32 2006
• RE: Bumblebee vs Killerbee - ronin1360, Sun Mar 5 23:32:29 2006
• RE: Bumblebee vs Killerbee - MarkS, Sun Mar 5 19:26:03 2006
• RE: Bumblebee vs Killerbee - ronin1360, Sun Mar 5 23:33:48 2006