I know your comments were directed towards Brendan,and rightly so,since he produced the boas in question. I'm addressing Randy,Mark & Djin(?) and their comments for the record...There is no proof that the Harlequin bloodline is solely,or directly responsible for the seemingly spontaneous mutation that occured,and I personally agree that to lead any potential investor/customer to believe that all animals produced from this bloodline are somehow "het for patternless" is outright deception...If any of you have noticed,neither Brendan,nor I have EVER made any such claim,(so before you start presumptively guessing about something you obviously know little,or NOTHING about,try to remember that the only person who has made such a claim,has NEVER EVEN produced anything from this bloodline! they're simply re-selling MY surplus!) I have spent the last nine years working with these animals,and have gone above & beyond anything close to standard hobby/industry protocol to keep from deceiving anyone about any aspect of what they represent,I refused to jump on the "pastel" bandwagon when it rolled through "boa-town",I also steadfastly insisted they were NOT Jungles,even though that would've been the short-term big money interest that MANY other less scrupulous hobbyists would've tried to hitch a ride on....so please don't insinuate that this project,whether you like it,or not,has anything to do with deception,or deceptive practices...and direct you concerns in this regard to the proper individual. we cannot police every person that buys an animal from us,but that doesn't mean we agree with every aspect of what they do with them when they leave here...thanks!
-----
EMAIL

[ Show Entire Thread ]