I have to wonder why you care what I think? or report. You do understand, I try not to think anything, it only gets you in trouble. I mostly report events or observations. Then someone wants an explination. I don't care to have an explination, not yet. I am gathering information, to make, "hard answers" is not recomented when taking in information. Of course, there are soft answers. The problem with soft answers is, others preceive them as hard answers.

When talking about behavior, there are few "hard answers". But the inexperienced do not understand what is hard and what is soft.

So if you really want to talk about monitors, you need to get specific, then I can report the events that I have witnessed.

For instance, if your gathering information, then you should not be doing this flack stuff. How about asking more about it. Like how it came about, what makes me think there is merit to it? etc etc. Then ask, if its based on results(yes) or what I think(i try not to think) Its merely results. You can make whatever you like out of it.
I suppose my task as a doer, what who actually does this. Is to make aware of some odd things. I have done that or you would not be asking this. Its not my task to figure it out or care it its figured out.

So please, you try to figure it out, I will be happy to help in any way I can. But simply put, Its ain't my job.

I am also confused as to why you spend more words and time trying to figure me out, when its the monitors that need the figuring. In all reality, it simply does not matter how I think of papers. Surely if you read the past conversations, you would understand, that I am constantly reminding people that there are good and not so good of EVERYTHING, including scientific papers. Its the suedo science folks who tend to believe that if is written, its so. Not me. I believe, if it happens, its so, even if I have no idea what it is. Cheers

[ Show Entire Thread ]