Just in case you're still reading:

1) The comments about your grammar were probably uncalled for.

2) You asked for people on this board to tell you everything they know about Gilas. That would take some people on this board (not me because I know fairly little about them) a week to type up what you could find with 5 minutes of searching on the web. That's not a reasonable request.

3) The first response answered your reasonably specific questions with a fairly small amount of sarcasm, at which point you went ballistic, working your way up to calling a long time member here at least two crude names your first appearance here...and then expect everyone to be nice you?

4) Your questions make it sound like you know almost nothing about gilas, so I think it's perfectly reasonable for someone to assume you're not qualified to keep them. If you didn't know they were protected, you can't have done much research.

5) This is an exact quote from your first message: "Where i can catch them?" and you think it was unreasonable for someone to assume that you wanted to catch some?

[ Hide Replies ]

• Gila's - polo6918, Thu Apr 6 13:04:34 2006
• RE: Gila's - PatrickR, Thu Apr 6 13:14:57 2006
• RE: Gila's - polo6918, Thu Apr 6 13:50:04 2006
• RE: Gila's - TJP, Thu Apr 6 14:46:50 2006
• I don't THINK beads are protected in Mex - Ryan Shackleton, Thu Apr 6 23:21:48 2006
• RE: I don't THINK beads are protected in - TimCole, Thu Apr 6 23:26:44 2006
• Ok, thanks - Ryan Shackleton, Fri Apr 7 07:37:09 2006
• RE: Gila's - LarryF, Thu Apr 6 20:30:44 2006
• RE: Gila's - mindlessvw, Fri Apr 7 10:49:41 2006
• RE: Gila's - polo6918, Fri Apr 7 11:07:10 2006
• RE: Gila's - LarryF, Sat Apr 8 00:42:16 2006
• But why... - herphobbyist, Thu Apr 6 22:08:02 2006
• RE: But why... - polo6918, Fri Apr 7 11:05:03 2006
• RE: Gila's - Shane_OK, Fri Apr 7 03:11:11 2006