![]() | mobile - desktop |
![]() |
Contact Sales! |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Snakes - General Forum ] |
Posted by: mchambers at Thu Apr 13 11:16:27 2006 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by mchambers ] difference on how they do in captivity ? It seems the west Texas or the more arid ones ( my experience ) do poorly in captivity due to getting them to take mammals for food. And the neonates even worse to feed non-lizards than our species of milk snakes here and they are about the same size at hatch-lings as our milk snakes ( small ). It seems the farther north the better of getting them to eat rodents. But then these could be the recognized sub-species. The family of Glossy has a fairly big distribution of range in the USA. I have found 2 of the species in west Texas although I had to watch which ones i ever brought back as to the Kansas species here is on a non collected list ( i think it is still so ). | ||
>> Next Message: RE: Arizona elegans, locality makes a - chrish, Thu Apr 13 15:57:38 2006 | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: Arizona elegans - chrish, Thu Apr 13 07:30:59 2006 | ||
|
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
| ||||||||