forgive me, it's been a few years since my last science class. As I was replying to that message, I had a dictionary open in my lap looking up the exact definition of "heterozygous," so I could be more conrete. As usual, the dictionary didn't help me much.

I should know better. I forgot that TECHNICALLY F1 Hypos, arabasques, motleys, ect, would actually be considered hets. I've gotten so caught up in co-dom and super talk.... haha. Because they would still have the 2 different Alleles from both parents, making them hets. Unless it would be what we consider "super," carrying only alleles of one gene. being an F2-4? hypo, or arabasque x arabasque result offspring, etc.

Sound a little better? haha. Thank you for pointing that out.

[ Hide Replies ]

• How many people agree... - JOEP123, Sat Apr 15 22:24:58 2006
• RE: How many people agree... - VolcomHerp, Sat Apr 15 23:24:07 2006
• In biology.... - NUCCIZ_BOAS, Sun Apr 16 03:49:16 2006
• In the world of genetics,101... - Rainshadow, Sun Apr 16 10:55:30 2006
• you're right - NUCCIZ_BOAS, Sun Apr 16 12:03:37 2006
• FANTASTIC REPLYS... - JOEP123, Sun Apr 16 12:24:47 2006
• Thanks to you both...also, - Rainshadow, Sun Apr 16 13:49:20 2006