Then I would consider the Arabesque to be dominant,like hypos,not "co-dominant" as many breeders insist. The examples Greg illustrated in his post above,are indicative of "co-dominance",in which the heterozygous & homozygous forms of a given mutation are phenotypically different in appearance. it's interesting to me that no one has come closer to proving this mutation conclusively. I remember seeing the first ones,on display in Baltimore,(94' I think?)that's a fair amount of time considering how many are working with them.
-----
EMAIL

[ Hide Replies ]

• SUPER ARABESQUE....PICS - toine, Tue Apr 18 07:18:29 2006
• Steve Hammond... - Psycodelic, Tue Apr 18 08:22:38 2006
• RE: Steve Hammond... - Albinoboa7, Tue Apr 18 08:26:28 2006
• RE: Yes!!! - ajfreptiles, Tue Apr 18 08:34:10 2006
• RE: Yes!!! - Albinoboa7, Tue Apr 18 08:35:32 2006
• RE: Yes!!! - Psycodelic, Tue Apr 18 08:59:30 2006
• RE: Yes!!! - Albinoboa7, Tue Apr 18 09:05:09 2006
• RE: Yes!!! - Psycodelic, Tue Apr 18 09:10:00 2006
• RE: Yes!!! - Albinoboa7, Tue Apr 18 09:21:42 2006
• (: LOL - Psycodelic, Tue Apr 18 09:24:05 2006
• If that proved homozygous... - Rainshadow, Tue Apr 18 09:42:10 2006
• RE: If that proved homozygous... - toine, Tue Apr 18 12:32:08 2006
• I plan to .. more - jayf, Tue Apr 18 13:44:15 2006
• good point... - Psycodelic, Tue Apr 18 14:02:06 2006
• the reason I posted about these...... - NUCCIZ_BOAS, Tue Apr 18 22:58:33 2006