![]() | market - home |
![]() |
![]() |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Ball Pythons ] |
Posted by: morphkingreptile at Wed Apr 26 15:54:57 2006 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by morphkingreptile ] clutches and never hatched anything out other than a lesser. Could it happen possibly but I doubt it. We actually had a female Mojave never breed a male that year becasue we never put a male with her and she had 5 slugs 1 good egg and it was a super mojave that shemust of stored sperm from the year berfore. It can happen and has with us. Wes keeps unbelievable records and knows what he puts with what. Everything is recorded when it happens. That is only explanation because she was never been with a male that year. Also we and Ralph have had several codom clutches with multiple fathers and up to 4 different morphs(combos) in the same clutch. Anything nan happen but I am pretty sure that has never happened with Ralph too. He probably has had at least 2x or 3x as many lesser clutches as us becasue he is the father of the project. Either way the lesser is the and best cross morph in my oppinion of the whole het for lucy deal. The king pin rules. The spider lesser rules. This is only my oppinion and I would pay big money for those animals and that is why we are going to make them in big numbers. We have held back every Lesser platinum female that we have made and most mojave females. I have a pinstripe that is possible het for the missing daddy platty gene and he is getting nothing but lessers next year. I love the Lesser no matter what and we have them both. I think it worth more money because the super mojave is really nice but the lesser cross we feel is worth more. It doesn't have a purple head. Our 3 lucy males are breeding everything including a bunch of normals so we shall see. Just telling what has happened with the lesser's at our facillity. | ||
>> Next Message: RE: We have had over 60 lesser to Normal - rcr, Wed Apr 26 17:48:54 2006 | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: OK OK OK OK - rcr, Wed Apr 26 15:36:20 2006 | ||
|
|
|
|