![]() | market - home |
![]() |
![]() |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Ball Pythons ] |
Posted by: Christy Talbert at Mon May 19 22:03:34 2003 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Christy Talbert ] If I recall, the zoo was claiming it to be a case of parthogenisis, not sperm storage, because if I recall correctly all the offspring were identical (to mom). Also, that female (again, if I recall correctly) had not been with a mail in 5 years...as they said in Jurassic Park...Life finds a way! | ||
>> Next Message: RE: I read that article a couple of months ago... - serpentcity, Tue May 20 00:15:31 2003 | ||
<< Previous Message: Is ANYONE interested in parthenogenesis/sperm storage??????? - serpentcity, Mon May 19 18:25:28 2003 | ||
|
|
|
|