![]() | mobile - desktop |
|
![]() |
![]() 3 months for $50.00 |
News & Events:
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Boa Forum ] |
Posted by: ChrisGilbert at Fri May 26 14:22:11 2006 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by ChrisGilbert ] I have used dominant for Hypos because you can't distinguish between the heterozygous and homozygous hypos with 100% certainty. So they are not co-dominant. However, by the definition I have of incomplete dominant mutations they are very similar to dominant mutations in the way they work, the variable comes into play with breeding to other mutations. I don't really know if this makes sense. I haven't used the incomplete dominance label before, but in an effort to better explain the characteristics of inheritance for each mutation, I thought this might be a good fit. Perhaps I should revert back. I do not want to misslead anyone, and I feel I have a fairly good handle on this stuff. Based on the phenotypes of boas with Hypo mutant genes, and the variability that does exist, I figured there has to be a reason and the incomplete dominance label may help to signify this. I realize this would be the first use of the term in the boid world. [ Hide Replies ]
| ||
>> Next topic: BOA WONT EAT??? help..... - Stuzzi, Fri May 26 03:16:14 2006 << Previous topic: Albino Rosy Boa... - ghireptiles, Thu May 25 21:08:29 2006 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|