Posted by:
LarryF
at Sun May 28 15:59:41 2006 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by LarryF ]
>>My definition of proof. First hand (confirmable) eye witness account with photos of eggs or netonates from someone who knows what their talking about.
We I think we already had this discussion in another thread, but just in case...
We're not talking about a reporter, or any random wildlife officer here. The person posting the story was a volunteer in the field and the people he qootes as saying they found a nest are the biologists hired specifically by the park service for the purpose of studying burmese pythons in the everglades. It's not like any average person with 5 minutes of instructions couldn't positively ID a 10 foot burmese in the park. Maybe some people might mistake a retic or a boa for a burm, but I hardly think that's a problem. Unless you seriously think it's an elaborate hoax by the National Park Service, I can't imagine why you have such a problem with this.
I've heard a lot of conjecture about how they got there and there's plenty of room for debate and study about that, but saying they're not there in numbers or that they couldn't breed successfully makes no sense to me.
Our refuge is a few miles outside the park, we stuck several burms we received into an outdoor enclose with no climate control and people walking by all day. They bred, we stuck the eggs in a box of (way too) wet mulch and threw them in the garage and forgot about them. About 95% hatched. I've been in areas on the edge of the park that were ABSOLUTELY PERFECT for incubating burm eggs. Hot, with thick ground cover and a mat of slightly moist soil almost like peat moss (maybe it is?). You think they would have trouble?
[ Hide Replies ]
- Invasive HOTS in the FL Everglades? - happysurgeman, Sat May 27 02:25:15 2006
- RE: Invasive HOTS in the FL Everglades? - rearfang, Sat May 27 06:42:10 2006
- RE: Invasive HOTS in the FL Everglades? - mchambers, Sat May 27 07:38:30 2006
- Keep it to yourself... - Upscale, Sat May 27 08:13:32 2006
- RE: Keep it to yourself... - LarryF, Sat May 27 09:02:31 2006
- Thanks for posting about that - Upscale, Sat May 27 09:11:05 2006
- RE: this news needs to be addressed as - mchambers, Sat May 27 09:58:03 2006
- RE: Invasive HOTS in the FL Everglades? - rearfang, Sat May 27 11:04:34 2006
- RE: Invasive HOTS in the FL Everglades? - mchambers, Sat May 27 11:55:16 2006
- RE: Invasive HOTS in the FL Everglades? - rearfang, Sat May 27 12:29:24 2006
- RE: 1 word bud > - mchambers, Sat May 27 18:01:53 2006
- RE: 1 more word - Greg Longhurst, Sat May 27 19:50:38 2006
- RE: Thanks for posting about that - LarryF, Sat May 27 19:51:37 2006
- RE: 1 more word - rearfang, Sat May 27 20:13:12 2006
- RE: Invasive HOTS in the FL Everglades? - LarryF, Sat May 27 20:13:59 2006
- RE: Am I going to have a problem with - mchambers, Sat May 27 20:59:17 2006
- RE: Invasive HOTS in the FL Everglades? - Upscale, Sat May 27 21:20:00 2006
- RE: Am I going to have a problem with - LarryF, Sat May 27 21:28:29 2006
- RE: 1 more word - zagarus42, Sat May 27 22:04:52 2006
- My last point here... - Upscale, Sat May 27 22:49:56 2006
- RE: 1 more word - rearfang, Sun May 28 06:39:53 2006
- RE: My last point here... - rearfang, Sun May 28 07:15:45 2006
- RE: 1 more word - wstreps, Sun May 28 07:22:51 2006
- Has this myth been busted? - Upscale, Sun May 28 08:21:05 2006
- RE: Has this myth been busted? - rearfang, Sun May 28 09:47:36 2006
- RE: 1 more word - zagarus42, Sun May 28 12:26:10 2006
- We Must Carry Cameras while we are there - happysurgeman, Sun May 28 12:50:51 2006
- RE: 1 more word - rearfang, Sun May 28 12:54:01 2006
- RE: We Must Carry Cameras while we are there - rearfang, Sun May 28 12:57:04 2006
- I tried your link... - rearfang, Sun May 28 13:07:44 2006
- RE: I tried your link... - zagarus42, Sun May 28 14:02:04 2006
RE: 1 more word - LarryF, Sun May 28 15:59:41 2006
- RE: 1 more word - rearfang, Sun May 28 17:57:13 2006
- RE: I tried your link... - rearfang, Sun May 28 18:06:38 2006
- RE: 1 more word - wstreps, Sun May 28 18:07:22 2006
- RE: We Must Carry Cameras while we are there - texasreptiles, Sun May 28 18:25:49 2006
- EXACTLY - rearfang, Sun May 28 18:26:30 2006
- RE: We Must Carry Cameras while we are there - rearfang, Sun May 28 18:38:12 2006
- RE: We Must Carry Cameras while we are there - texasreptiles, Sun May 28 18:51:02 2006
- RE: We Must Carry Cameras while we are there - rearfang, Sun May 28 18:53:58 2006
- RE: We Must Carry Cameras while we are there - yoyoing, Sun May 28 19:03:44 2006
- RE: We Must Carry Cameras while we are there - texasreptiles, Sun May 28 19:12:19 2006
- RE: We Must Carry Cameras while we are there - Upscale, Sun May 28 19:29:47 2006
- RE: 1 more word - LarryF, Sun May 28 20:17:20 2006
- RE: 1 more word - texasreptiles, Sun May 28 20:23:05 2006
- RE: I tried your link... - texasreptiles, Sun May 28 20:26:51 2006
- RE: 1 more word - yoyoing, Sun May 28 20:31:34 2006
- RE: We Must Carry Cameras while we are there - billstevenson, Sun May 28 21:04:28 2006
- RE: We Must Carry Cameras while we are there - CBH, Sun May 28 21:39:24 2006
- RE: 1 more word - wstreps, Sun May 28 22:19:35 2006
- RE: 1 more word - LarryF, Sun May 28 23:25:14 2006
- RE: We Must Carry Cameras while we are t - LarryF, Sun May 28 23:43:33 2006
- RE: We Must Carry Cameras while we are t - CBH, Sun May 28 23:59:17 2006
- RE: I tried your link... - LarryF, Mon May 29 00:15:30 2006
- RE: invasive non-native in Texas that - mchambers, Mon May 29 06:41:03 2006
- RE: I tried your link... - rearfang, Mon May 29 07:17:40 2006
- RE: I tried your link... - rearfang, Mon May 29 07:20:35 2006
- RE: 1 more word - rearfang, Mon May 29 07:31:33 2006
- SIDEBAR...Since some of you ask why? - rearfang, Mon May 29 07:59:16 2006
- $$$$$$$ - Upscale, Mon May 29 08:54:11 2006
- RE: 1 more word - LarryF, Mon May 29 11:09:34 2006
- RE: $$$$$$$ - rearfang, Mon May 29 11:10:04 2006
- RE: 1 more word - rearfang, Mon May 29 11:25:11 2006
- RE: SIDEBAR...Since some of you ask why? - LarryF, Mon May 29 11:32:03 2006
- RE: SIDEBAR...Since some of you ask why? - rearfang, Mon May 29 12:05:08 2006
- RE: SIDEBAR...Since some of you ask why? - LarryF, Mon May 29 12:52:30 2006
- RE: more word--and a wrong one at that - rdbartlett, Mon May 29 13:42:53 2006
- RE: 1 more word - wstreps, Mon May 29 14:31:53 2006
- RE: SIDEBAR...Since some of you ask why? - rearfang, Mon May 29 14:32:05 2006
- RE: SIDEBAR...Since some of you ask why? - LarryF, Mon May 29 15:06:10 2006
- RE: invasive non-native in Texas that - CBH, Tue May 30 13:09:26 2006
- RE: invasive non-native in Texas that - rearfang, Tue May 30 14:55:58 2006
- RE: LOL ! as many of the med. geckos - mchambers, Wed May 31 09:36:41 2006
|