mobile - desktop |
Available Now at RodentPro.com! |
News & Events:
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Boa Forum ] |
Posted by: boaphile at Wed Jul 12 13:48:02 2006 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by boaphile ] By the way.. a little hint, sort of. The marker is FAR more obvious in babies. Once they hit 3' or more, it is much less reliable. I have gotten all the babies that I have been able to observe and prove out as hets. So 100% so far on identifying babies. That is no fewer than 12 individuals. My record with larger, that is 6' or longer animals, is 9 correct and 2 unconfirmed yet or likely wrong. Those are pretty good odds. One of the non-het animals I had hoped was a het, just had a huge litter born about two weeks ago. She was one of the two I had gotten incorrect. I was only able to check her after I had raised her up to about 5'. Now at just about 10' she was enormous and she was bred by a Sunglow male. The litter consisted of no Sunglows or Albinos. Tell me I wasn't depressed. Very disappointed indeed. [ Hide Replies ]
| ||
>> Next topic: RESIZED Type II Anery Post.... - Amanda_Burke, Wed Jul 12 11:01:46 2006 << Previous topic: More Confusion About Type II Anery's.... - Amanda_Burke, Tue Jul 11 23:49:21 2006 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|