What about the "incomplete co-dominant" possibility? How about some scientific data from some of you genetics majors. Real scientific points not reptile accepted nomenclature which too often bears no resemblance to science. For instance; Here is an example or a generally accepted reptile misuse of a real scientific term: A "super" Hypo is not a co-dominant animal vs. a non-super being a dominant hypo. The Hypo trait is one or the other. Most believe it is dominant and not co-dominant at all. This is an example of an incorrect application or blatant misuse of a previously clearly defined scientific term. So if you are a scientific genetic wiz kid. What about my assertion that, at least this strain of Albino, that may be identifiable in the heterozygous form and therefore a "incomplete co-dominant" genetic trait and not a simple recessive trait at all. What we have always believed to be true about whatever, isn't true because we believe it is. It is true because it is scientifically accurate and meets all the qualifications of the definition of what a simple recessive trait is. Wiz kids... ideas?

[ Show Entire Thread ]