(Jungle & Motley)are "Co-dominant",(not "co-dominate",like alot of websites state.) they fit this catagory because the homozygous form is phenotypiclly different from both the het form & the "normal",or wild type....Dave doesn't need to change his definitions,everyone else needs to read from the same sheet of music! especially as we move forward with new mutations,AND new combinations of the ones we currently acknoledge...the future of "boaculture" is multiple gene carriers!
-----
HarlequinBoa.com Captive born excellence through applied genetic theory...and,astute observations based on a keen sense of the sometimes painfully obvious

[ Hide Replies ]

• Red Tail Boas, and het./hypo. morphs?? - MacKenzie001, Wed Aug 16 13:18:33 2006
• Long answer....... - rainbowsrus, Wed Aug 16 14:23:27 2006
• ~Jungles & Motleys are Dominant~ - BrownsBoas, Wed Aug 16 19:32:43 2006
• Jungles & Motleys are CO-Dominant - jayf, Wed Aug 16 19:46:39 2006
• Both mutations - Rainshadow, Wed Aug 16 19:47:42 2006
• RE: Both mutations - BrownsBoas, Wed Aug 16 19:58:01 2006
• The best way to look at it... - Rainshadow, Wed Aug 16 20:13:36 2006
• I should also add... - Rainshadow, Wed Aug 16 20:20:06 2006
• Rainshadow..... - vcaruso15, Wed Aug 16 20:46:38 2006
• Rather than... - Rainshadow, Wed Aug 16 21:17:36 2006
• RE: Rather than... - vcaruso15, Wed Aug 16 22:10:01 2006
• RE: I should also add... - BrownsBoas, Wed Aug 16 21:17:31 2006
• No,what I'm really trying to say...is... - Rainshadow, Wed Aug 16 21:43:37 2006
• RE: Both mutations - jayf, Wed Aug 16 20:20:34 2006
• RE: Red Tail Boas, and het./hypo. morphs?? - PanamaRed, Wed Aug 16 14:29:02 2006
• Slight correction. - rainbowsrus, Wed Aug 16 14:45:02 2006
• RE: Slight correction. - PanamaRed, Wed Aug 16 14:49:02 2006
• How does making it - Rainshadow, Wed Aug 16 15:26:08 2006
• Ya beat me..... - rainbowsrus, Wed Aug 16 15:56:48 2006
• Your reply to the original post, - Rainshadow, Wed Aug 16 16:02:29 2006
• RE: Your reply to the original post, - rainbowsrus, Wed Aug 16 19:57:22 2006
• No disrespect meant..... - rainbowsrus, Wed Aug 16 15:54:25 2006
• Why so critical...LOL... - PanamaRed, Wed Aug 16 16:29:47 2006
• wrong again....... - vcaruso15, Wed Aug 16 17:07:07 2006
• Didn't I just state that? - PanamaRed, Wed Aug 16 17:21:45 2006
• I dont know did you? lol - vcaruso15, Wed Aug 16 17:31:44 2006
• RE: Didn't I just state that? - jayf, Wed Aug 16 19:51:33 2006
• RE: Didn't I just state that? - PanamaRed, Thu Aug 17 13:10:37 2006
• That's the problem >>>>> - RyanHomsey, Thu Aug 17 16:40:32 2006
• RE: Slight correction. - craig k., Wed Aug 16 16:21:27 2006
• It is correct... - Rainshadow, Wed Aug 16 16:30:35 2006
• Good point. np. - craig k., Wed Aug 16 16:35:57 2006
• RE: Good point. np. - MacKenzie001, Wed Aug 16 22:24:28 2006
• Ahhh,you're looking for... - Rainshadow, Wed Aug 16 23:26:02 2006
• RE: Ahhh,you're looking for... - MacKenzie001, Wed Aug 16 23:37:44 2006
• It's not that elusive ........... - wstreps, Thu Aug 17 07:27:07 2006