Posted by:
paalexan
at Tue Aug 12 18:10:16 2003 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by paalexan ]
` The group is not polyphyletic; Elaphe is not polyphyletic.'
I wrote:
I await new data suggesting that this is the case.
Your response:
Before such new data becomes available, it is premature to assert that Elaphe is polyphyletic.
You're saying that it's premature to assert that Elaphe is polyphyletic until we have data demonstrating that Elaphe is not polyphyletic? This amounts to an a priori rejection of the possibility of polyphyly.
`If it is not polyphyletic, then it ought not be splintered unless the members of this genus form a morphologically disparate group. Utiger et al. show no evidence that they use morphological disparity to splinter Elaphe. Hence their destruction of Elaphe is untenable.'
Utiger et al. do, however, cite other works which demonstrate that Elaphe sensu lato is a morphologically disparate group. See, for instance, Helfenberger, N. `Phylogenetic Relationships of Old World Ratsnakes Based on Visceral Organ Topography, Osteology, and Allozyme Variation', Russian Journal of Herpetology 8 (Suppl.) 1-64.
`Both Utiger et al. and Lopez and Maxson find that Elaphe is not polyphyletic.'
Your assessment of their results differs with theirs. For the Utiger et al., see other discussion in this thread. Out of curiosity I got hold of the Lopez et al. (Lopez, Maxson, and Dowling) paper, and found the following:
First, they do not have the data to adequately test the phylogenetic relationships within Elaphe sensu lato (albumin distances for were only found between Pantherophis obsoletus and each of four species of Elaphe sensu stricto and Pantherophis guttatus). Given that the purpose of the paper was the determination of the intergeneric relationships between Dasypeltis and other colubrine genera, this is not surprising.
Second, the conclusion to which they come regarding phylogenetic relationships within Elaphe sensu lato is that: `From these tests we conclude only that the Eurasian ratsnakes are roughly equidistant from the Nearctic ratsnakes and the racers.'
`Their findings are supported by a third paper recently published in Acta Zoologica Sinica.'
The inadequacies of this study have already been mentioned.
`That is three independent studies proving that Elaphe is not polyphyletic. There may well be new data suggesting otherwise, but until they are available, there simply is no evidence of polyphyly.'
Your assessment of two of those studies disagrees with that of their authors. Including the other papers cited by Utiger et al. and mentioned elsewhere in the thread demonstrating polyphyly of Elaphe sensu lato, this gives a total of 5 independent studies demonstrating polyphyly of Elaphe sensu lato and 1 disagreeing.
Patrick Alexander
[ Hide Replies ]
- Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Tue Aug 5 15:20:38 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Fri Aug 8 19:48:08 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Sat Aug 9 18:35:21 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Sun Aug 10 12:09:44 2003

- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Sun Aug 10 14:45:35 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Mon Aug 11 06:46:54 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Mon Aug 11 13:03:04 2003

- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Mon Aug 11 18:39:41 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Mon Aug 11 23:10:39 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Mon Aug 11 23:12:29 2003
- Sorry about the double post. No changes in content between them. ~NP~ - paalexan, Mon Aug 11 23:13:57 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Tue Aug 12 00:36:58 2003

- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Tue Aug 12 05:19:31 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Tue Aug 12 05:32:50 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Tue Aug 12 11:48:08 2003
RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Tue Aug 12 18:10:16 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Tue Aug 12 18:25:24 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Wed Aug 13 01:12:02 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Wed Aug 13 01:54:51 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Wed Aug 13 02:09:40 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Wed Aug 13 08:59:13 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Wed Aug 13 09:14:49 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Wed Aug 13 21:35:06 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Wed Aug 13 22:00:23 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Wed Aug 13 22:17:50 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Wed Aug 13 22:21:06 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Wed Aug 13 22:40:01 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Wed Aug 13 22:53:13 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Wed Aug 13 23:36:35 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Thu Aug 14 13:48:59 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Thu Aug 14 14:14:15 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Thu Aug 14 14:37:05 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Thu Aug 14 14:52:04 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Thu Aug 14 14:53:36 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Sun Aug 17 02:43:22 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Sun Aug 17 05:22:14 2003

- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Sun Aug 17 22:56:37 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Sun Aug 17 23:24:09 2003
- BTW... - paalexan, Mon Aug 18 11:14:35 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Sun Sep 21 09:48:50 2003

- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Sun Sep 21 11:34:01 2003

- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Sun Sep 21 12:14:10 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Sun Sep 21 13:41:40 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Mon Sep 22 19:46:48 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Thu Sep 25 19:33:57 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Sat Sep 27 16:08:57 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Sun Sep 28 03:19:10 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Sun Sep 28 03:22:40 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Sun Sep 28 18:29:39 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Sun Sep 28 22:02:37 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Sun Oct 5 02:11:40 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - paalexan, Sun Oct 5 03:54:01 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Sun Oct 5 09:50:27 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Mon Dec 22 10:07:23 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Mon Dec 22 10:25:05 2003
- RE: Elaphe is not polyphyletic - RSNewton, Mon Dec 22 10:42:55 2003
|