No if it was dominant than there would be no difference between the hypos and super hypos and there definetly is. Now there are some that look alike but that is only in very clean hypo individuals. If you look at a hypo, not one that looks overy great, you can still see that normal coloration in part of it. So it could not be dominant and still show the normal coloration.
-----
1.1 Motley het butter corns
0.1 Snow corn
0.1 Okeetee corn
1.0 Anery mutt corn
0.1 Stripe Ghost corn
0.1 Amelanistic corn het carmel
2.1 Colombian Redtails
1.0 Hypo Colombian redtail
1.0 Brazilian Rainbow Boa
1.0 Anery Kenyan sand boa
0.1 Normal Kenyan sand boa

[ Hide Replies ]

• In light of the recent genetics topics - SuppleReptiles, Tue Sep 26 20:37:57 2006
• Hypos are NOT Co-dominant... - ChrisGilbert, Tue Sep 26 20:58:04 2006
• Yup. . . - SuppleReptiles, Tue Sep 26 21:01:01 2006
• The hypo gene is co-dominant.... - tsusnakeguy, Tue Sep 26 21:36:23 2006
• No... - ChrisGilbert, Tue Sep 26 22:05:15 2006
• RE: No... - tsusnakeguy, Tue Sep 26 22:36:30 2006
• There is not a 100% visual difference... - ChrisGilbert, Tue Sep 26 23:44:49 2006
• RE: The hypo gene is co-dominant.... - SuppleReptiles, Tue Sep 26 22:13:16 2006
• One typo. . . - SuppleReptiles, Tue Sep 26 22:16:11 2006
• I could agree with incomplete n/p - tsusnakeguy, Tue Sep 26 22:32:48 2006
• RE: The hypo gene is co-dominant.... - Paul Hollander, Wed Sep 27 13:50:43 2006
• RE: The hypo gene is co-dominant.... - PanamaRed, Tue Sep 26 22:45:16 2006
• RE: The hypo gene is co-dominant.... - awesomo6000, Tue Sep 26 23:30:06 2006