That combination would be interesting, but they wouldn't be " Stillwater" patternless since they lost the locality part of it when bred to another snake that is not a Stillwater. Localities can't be a " het " trait, thus there can not be " het Stillwater " babies. The hypo gene may be there, which is cool, but the Stillwater locality part is lost with the first non-Stillwater bull breeding. Same with Kingsville reds.



This does not take away from the snakes that are hatched from these breedings, nor does it make them any less special. There are locality snake keepers out there that would not like any snake that is non locale, which I disagree with. I just bring this up from a proper labeling standpoint.



Take care!

Billy

-----
Genesis 1:1

[ Hide Replies ]

• 1st year breeding bulls............... - DerekMoynihan, Mon Oct 2 09:44:17 2006
• RE: 1st year breeding bulls............... - irunfast, Mon Oct 2 12:36:07 2006
• RE: 1st year breeding bulls............... - DISCERN, Mon Oct 2 18:28:55 2006
• RE: 1st year breeding bulls............... - irunfast, Mon Oct 2 23:02:59 2006
• RE: 1st year breeding bulls............... - DISCERN, Mon Oct 2 23:18:13 2006
• RE: 1st year breeding bulls............... - durrus, Tue Oct 3 09:51:33 2006
• RE: 1st year breeding bulls............... - DISCERN, Tue Oct 3 12:21:41 2006
• but............... - JaredAren, Wed Oct 4 16:56:10 2006
• RE: but............... - DISCERN, Wed Oct 4 17:16:01 2006
• RE: but............... - JAredAren, Thu Oct 5 10:03:27 2006
• RE: but............... - DISCERN, Thu Oct 5 12:02:43 2006
• RE: but............... - derekmoynihan, Fri Oct 6 23:19:00 2006
• RE: but............... - DISCERN, Sat Oct 7 00:08:20 2006
• RE: 1st year breeding bulls............... - reako45, Tue Oct 3 00:54:27 2006