![]() | market - home |
![]() |
![]() |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Pine/Bull/Gopher Snakes ] |
Posted by: DISCERN at Mon Oct 2 18:28:55 2006 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by DISCERN ] That combination would be interesting, but they wouldn't be " Stillwater" patternless since they lost the locality part of it when bred to another snake that is not a Stillwater. Localities can't be a " het " trait, thus there can not be " het Stillwater " babies. The hypo gene may be there, which is cool, but the Stillwater locality part is lost with the first non-Stillwater bull breeding. Same with Kingsville reds. | ||
>> Next Message: RE: 1st year breeding bulls............... - irunfast, Mon Oct 2 23:02:59 2006 >> Next Message: RE: 1st year breeding bulls............... - durrus, Tue Oct 3 09:51:33 2006 >> Next Message: but............... - JaredAren, Wed Oct 4 16:56:10 2006 | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: 1st year breeding bulls............... - irunfast, Mon Oct 2 12:36:07 2006 | ||
|
|
|
|