"the only person that did an arabesque x arabesque breeding with "different" looking results was Jeremy Stone. However you're right, nothing really stands out as a definate "super."

Just my opinion, I would not be surprised if Arabesques turned out not to be a genetic morph at all, but rather a Locality of it's own."

I thought only Steve Hammond bred Arabesque X Arabesque, and there were some babies that were missing saddles, and these are theorized to be the supers, time will tell.

And Arabesques ARE genetic, so I'm not sure what you meant by your second statement. It is just not known if they are a co-dominant or dominant mutation.

Their heads are different, Arabesques, along with a few other "Colombian" morphs have very unique traits. It may just be from geographic distribution, or it may be from the mutation. A mutation could affect th structure and shape of the head.

[ Hide Replies ]

• ARAB X ARAB,,,,,,or ARAB X HYPO??????? - toine, Sat Oct 21 08:25:38 2006
• RE: ARAB X ARAB,,,,,,or ARAB X HYPO??????? - Randall_Turner, Sat Oct 21 08:49:22 2006
• thanks,,,,,,more - toine, Sat Oct 21 09:12:19 2006
• RE: thanks,,,,,,more - vcaruso15, Sat Oct 21 10:10:59 2006
• RE: thanks,,,,,,more - toine, Sat Oct 21 10:38:43 2006
• I agree - NUCCIZ_BOAS, Sat Oct 21 12:37:49 2006
• RE: I agree - toine, Sat Oct 21 14:32:46 2006
• by the way,,NUCCIZ BOAS,,,more - toine, Sat Oct 21 15:08:53 2006
• RE: I agree - ChrisGilbert, Sat Oct 21 15:30:01 2006
• you're right! but food for thought..... - NUCCIZ_BOAS, Mon Oct 23 23:17:26 2006
• RE: you're right! but food for thought. - ChrisGilbert, Tue Oct 24 07:17:40 2006
• ARAB X ARAB in my opinion - sun_king, Sat Oct 21 14:25:54 2006
• RE: ARAB X ARAB in my opinion - toine, Sat Oct 21 14:45:31 2006
• RE: ARAB X ARAB in my opinion - Ophidia_Junkie, Sat Oct 21 21:58:45 2006
• Steve Hammond??? - sun_king, Sat Oct 21 22:10:01 2006
• RE: Steve we need HELP,,,,,,, - toine, Sun Oct 22 14:37:51 2006