the G1 has been proven to not be compatible with the orange ghost so more than likely it is not compatible with most of the other lines as well. However, the citrus has not been crossed with any other line as of yet so nobody can say whether it is or isn't compatible. Yes it looks different than other lines but that is mainly due to the fact that GCR bred the original male citrus into a genetic high gold animal (which is why the citrus hets look sooooo good as well). They continued breeding the high golds into the line reinforcing the high gold coloring into the hypo animals. Having talked with Chris and Sheila many times about this, they think it will prove to be compatible as the founding male looked more like a blonde ghost than what they have made the morph into through strict selective breeding. The great thing about the genetics of ball pythons is what we have all learned, you can't assume anything until it is proven out.
-----
Josh & Krysty Hutto
J&K Reptiles

Various Ball Pythons:::

1.0 striped vanilla
1.0 spider
1.2 Citrus Ghost and hets
1.2 Albino and hets
2.3 het Pied
0.6 50% poss het pied
1.1 Pastel (male has additional gene going on with him)
a bunch of normal female breeders
a bunch of normal female holdbacks and several rescued normal males

0.1 columbian boa, she's a feeding monster, controls my
over production of rats, lol
0.1 brazilian rainbow boa, another rat eating monster
1.1 corns


a BAD dog is MADE not bred, support the American Pit Bull Terrier as the greatest breed of dogs on Earth!!!!!

[ Hide Replies ]

• Compatible Ghosts? - johnmartino, Wed Feb 7 08:57:38 2007
• RE: Compatible Ghosts? - toshamc, Wed Feb 7 11:17:57 2007
• RE: Compatible Ghosts? - joshhutto, Wed Feb 7 17:39:07 2007
• I will let you know.......... - methistina, Thu Feb 8 10:45:26 2007
• RE: I will let you know.......... - joshhutto, Thu Feb 8 16:21:14 2007
• RE: I will let you know.......... - EmberBall, Thu Feb 8 19:33:08 2007
• They are .... - methistina, Fri Feb 9 13:03:10 2007
• RE: They are .... - EmberBall, Fri Feb 9 14:38:52 2007
• RE: They are .... - methistina, Fri Feb 9 22:32:55 2007
• RE: They are .... - EmberBall, Sat Feb 10 00:10:38 2007
• RE: They are .... - joshhutto, Fri Feb 9 23:43:59 2007
• RE: They are .... - EmberBall, Sat Feb 10 00:02:21 2007
• RE: They are .... - EmberBall, Sat Feb 10 00:04:16 2007
• RE: They are .... - joshhutto, Sat Feb 10 00:38:59 2007
• RE: They are .... - EmberBall, Sat Feb 10 12:08:29 2007
• RE: They are .... - methistina, Sun Feb 11 00:30:17 2007