Posted by:
psycodelic
at Thu Feb 8 11:55:21 2007 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by psycodelic ]
Your reply makes sense sort of... here is my rebuttal...
1) You went out of your way to compare a nice looking sunglow to specific sharp sunglow that is an exception to typical sunglows. Where did Ryan ever mention sharps or a any sort of comparison in his original post?
2) You telling me that as more sharps are outcrossed they are going to only get better and all the offspring in the future are only going to look even better than the previous generation? Interesting we have come so far to have complete control of the appearance of Boas we produce. The human genome project might have some questions for us as to how we can do that for humans.
3) No you were not mentioning prices but again Ryan was not mentioning sharps either. However the sunglow you mention had to be north of 12k in 04 it price being reflected by the $ and effort its breeder took to produce such a beautiful animal. So talk about comparing apples to oranges we are talking about how beautiful his sunglow is not which strain is better we heard that argument a thousand times.
As far as you not hating the Kahl line I understand that. It would take a lot for me to hate a genetic trait. What I don’t understand why your post could not have been positive like “wow looks close to Rons Sharp Sunglow!” or something?
We are all friends here. Some of our freinds like Kahls some like Sharps.
Greg Reinert
[ Hide Replies ]
|